Archiwum grupy dyskusyjnej o aktywistach ekologicznych
Serwis istnieje dzięki uprzejmości:
poprzednia
strona ------------- następna
strona From: "AW" <one_at_large[]hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Love Thy Neighbor. Bring Them Happiness. Get Them High! Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:01:49 GMT
wrote in message
news:1128559061.322580.26000@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Many libertarians believe that the sole purpose why we need government
> is for security.
> Two people will not agree with it. The unattractive, and the
> unproductive.
>
> Of course, those who cannot compete by giving better offer are not
> going to just admit it by saying so. Those who demand sex laws against
> consensual sex will not say, "I oppose free sex because no women want
> me and oraz want to ration females to inferior males such as i am." It's
> not to their best interest to be honest and they'll come up with
> something else.
>
> So what?
>
> Well, within a democratic frameworks, for example, those inferior
> people will demand sex laws and social programs to mask their lack of
> capability.
>
> So fuck democracy! Well, not that simple. You see, without democracy,
> the alternative is civil war. We're in deep shit no matter what.
>
> Hardcore libertarians will simply say, "Kill them all! They violated
> individual freedom, they want war. Summon Pinochet, etc."
>
> Not here.
>
> You see, Jesus told us to love our enemy. Rather than killing them all
> we should try to appease them by making them happy.
>
> Of course, we should do so at the minimum cost.
>
> oraz once suggested that the rich should help eliminate poverty by
> knocking up as many females as possible. That way, the ratio between
> the productive people and the parasitic will be more and more.
>
> That way, for a much lower level of sacrifice from the productive, the
> parasites will get more. It's win win. The thing is this brilliant idea
> is prohibited by bigots.
>
> Apparently, envy, rather than need, cause their unhappiness. We need to
> think of more ways to make enemies of freedom happy with minimum
> deviation from meritocracy.
>
> How can we make people happy with minimum cost?
>
> Well, we get them high!
>
> Think it this way, you come to a good for nothing no body, and say,
> "Stop making kids, embrace capitalism, here's food, shelter, and
> dope!" Do you think they'll object?
>
> It's victimless and humane way to get rid the inferior from the gene
> pool. Nowadays, many people clink to hunger. With small cash, the smart
> among them can use the cash we give to start a business rather than use
> dope. Either way, they'll be happy.
>
> Now, they'll have a choice to be happy.
>
> They'll be happier, we'll be happier. So why not?
>
> If we don't give them free dopes, they'll demand something much more
> expensive, like jobs, or public school. Even worse, they'll demand sex
> laws that ration females to poor dumb males. That'll make the poor
> breed like rabbits costing us more money.
>
> oraz tell you the truth. Love your enemy, get them high! For that way
> you'll be like your Father in heaven that pour rain to the bad as well
> as the good guy. It's happier to those who give than to those who
> receive. The meek, shall inherit the earth.
> Who knows, heaven is just hell on dope.
>
>
> Now some would say that drugs are expensive. Not if it were legal.
>
> Consensual usage is victimless. Prohibition of dope is not victimless.
> Just like tax, job creation, subsidy, and sex laws.
>
> Jim
>
Jim, my dear freind, you are a moron! Just one more moron. That's all.
Andre
From: "grzegorz" <gs45[]poczta.onet.pl> Subject: Re: Cichy Kat Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:51:56 +0200
"Cichy Kat" hmmmmmmmmm to nie brzmi najlepiej.
ale strona niczego sobie
pozdrawiam
gs44 inne